Finding the right Quality Manager has become one of manufacturing's toughest hiring challenges because the role requires a combination of strengths that are rarely found in one person.
Auditor judgment does not end with identifying a nonconformity. It also shapes how auditors determine which standard requirement best reflects the evidence.
The demand for evidence showing the real-world value of certifications is growing, but certification bodies often lack data on what happens after individuals earn their credentials.
The tasks nobody clearly owns are often the ones that reveal how organizations really function and provide some of the biggest opportunities for professional growth.
When production stops unexpectedly, the pressure to find a quick explanation — and the pull of confirmation bias — can be just as dangerous as the problem itself.
Organizations often gain the greatest value from audit findings when they view them as opportunities to strengthen their operations rather than as criticism or punishment.
The phrase “as appropriate” in ISO 13485 gives organizations flexibility to build a quality management system (QMS) that reflects their products, activities and risks rather than requiring every requirement to be applied in the same way.
Appraising what a good quality manager actually is is not an easy task, but Taiwo Olagoke, Quality Improvement Manager at PZ Cussons, offers a practical framework for doing it.
Even though the upcoming ISO 9001:2026 edition has been widely presented as bringing new focus to artificial intelligence, digitalization, sustainability and resilience,
The German Accreditation Body (DAkkS) has moved from planning to implementation of a major reform effort, but questions remain about its ability to produce meaningful results.
Travel is often viewed as a business expense, but Michael Mills argues that, in the right circumstances, it can be a worthwhile investment in company culture.
Inspection bodies preparing for future accreditation assessments will face new expectations under ISO/IEC 17020:2026, the first major revision of the standard in more than a decade.
Organizations certified to ISO/IEC 42001may still face compliance gaps under the European Union AI Act when developing or placing high-risk AI systems on the European market.